Which assessment option is valid for measuring a person's competencies for a job?

The structured interview is a valid assessment option for measuring a person's competencies for a job because it is designed to gather in-depth information about the candidate's qualifications, experience, and skills through a consistent set of questions. In a structured interview, all candidates are asked the same questions, which helps to eliminate bias and allows for more straightforward comparisons between candidates. This format not only assesses candidates' skills and experiences but also evaluates their problem-solving abilities and behavioral traits, which are critical components of job competencies.

Structured interviews are typically tied to the specific requirements of the job and often include situational or behavioral questions that provide insight into how candidates may handle real-life scenarios related to the position. This makes them an effective tool for assessing how well a candidate's competencies align with the job's demands.

In contrast, other assessment options, while useful in some contexts, may not provide as direct a measurement of competencies. Cover letters and applications offer preliminary insights but may lack depth in evaluating specific job-related abilities. Writing samples can demonstrate certain skills, particularly in roles that require written communication, but they do not encompass the full range of competencies needed for many positions. Hence, the structured interview stands out as the most comprehensive option for competency assessment in the context of job evaluation.